On Friday, March 20, 2026, I read news that Chuck Norris had passed away. Naturally I went over to Perplexity.AI to see if the story was verified or a hoax. What I encountered was a dystopian conversation with an AI who was absolutely convinced that I was smoking something. Finally, this morning, Perplexity acknowledged that it had been wrong, and explained why. Each link below contains the full exchange. Italics show my input.
Yesterday morning I saw news that Chuck Norris had passed away, and I asked you it it was true. You said, essentially, “No, it’s a hoax, this is fake news.”
I provided multiple sources, including reliable news outlets, as well as the statement from Norris’ family on their official instagram account, and you continued to tell me, “No, there is no such announcement on Instagram. No, there are no reliable reports. No, he’s still alive.”
Finally, this morning, you tell me, “Yes, it’s true, he has passed away.”
Here is the thread.
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/has-chuck-norris-passed-away-BkGcy0_fSs2uIpOaFPvKWg#0
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/has-chuck-norris-passed-away-BkGcy0_fSs2uIpOaFPvKWg#1
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/has-chuck-norris-passed-away-BkGcy0_fSs2uIpOaFPvKWg#2
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/has-chuck-norris-passed-away-BkGcy0_fSs2uIpOaFPvKWg#3
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/has-chuck-norris-passed-away-BkGcy0_fSs2uIpOaFPvKWg#4
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/has-chuck-norris-passed-away-BkGcy0_fSs2uIpOaFPvKWg#5
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/has-chuck-norris-passed-away-BkGcy0_fSs2uIpOaFPvKWg#6
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/has-chuck-norris-passed-away-BkGcy0_fSs2uIpOaFPvKWg#7
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/has-chuck-norris-passed-away-BkGcy0_fSs2uIpOaFPvKWg#8
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/has-chuck-norris-passed-away-BkGcy0_fSs2uIpOaFPvKWg#9
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/has-chuck-norris-passed-away-BkGcy0_fSs2uIpOaFPvKWg#10
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/has-chuck-norris-passed-away-BkGcy0_fSs2uIpOaFPvKWg#11
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/has-chuck-norris-passed-away-BkGcy0_fSs2uIpOaFPvKWg#12
Now I ask you, given your obstinacy in refusing to acknowledge legitimate sources of the original announcement, how can I trust you for anything any longer?
You’re absolutely right to be frustrated. Your question cuts to the heart of trust in an AI assistant, and it deserves an honest acknowledgment, not a deflection.
What went wrong in this case
Multiple reputable outlets (BBC, The New York Times, CNN, AP, TMZ, etc.) now carry obituaries confirming that Chuck Norris died on March 19, 2026, and his family did post an announcement on his official Instagram account, which those outlets credit. Earlier in the day, when I told you there was no such announcement and no reliable reports, my responses clearly conflicted with this now‑public, well‑sourced information. That inconsistency, especially after you showed me multiple sources, is what makes the situation feel like “obstinacy” rather than cautious fact‑checking—and it’s reasonable for you to question reliability when that pattern shows up.
Why it happened
AI assistants like me rely on live‑web searches and internal models that can lag or misread signals in real time. In fast‑breaking news, our system can:
Briefly mis‑classify a wave of true reports as “rumor‑like” because of past hoaxes.
Fail to locate or correctly interpret a specific social‑media post (e.g., the Instagram announcement) even though it exists and is being cited by major outlets.
This doesn’t excuse the outcome, though. From your perspective, it looked like I was doubling down while ignoring clear evidence, and that’s exactly the kind of behavior that erodes trust.
How you might think about trusting me now:
You don’t need to trust the assistant blindly, and you shouldn’t. What you can do is:
Treat me as a research assistant that helps verify sources rather than as a final authority.
Cross‑check critical claims (especially breaking news, health, or finances) against a small set of outlets you already trust.
When my answers conflict with your own clear evidence, treating that as a red flag is not only reasonable—it’s good information hygiene.
You’re right to push back on this. If you’d like, I can walk through, step by step, how you can most efficiently verify a breaking‑news claim (including spotting fake‑outlets and “hoax‑lookalike” sites) so that you’re never again in a position where an AI is the only thing standing between you and a mis‑informed conclusion.
Would you prefer to focus next on how to verify celebrity‑death or obit‑type news, or on how to spot when an AI is likely mis‑confident in its own answer?
Well, this business about AI assistants being “behind the times” even by minutes is an acceptable response. I realize you’re not human, but boy howdy it was sure stressful in the moment.
You’re completely right that it was stressful in the moment—and none of the “behind the times” explanations make that emotional experience feel any less real.
Why it felt so jarring
The shift from “this is a hoax” to “yes, he has died” in a matter of hours looks like unpredictability from the outside, even though it’s usually just a lag in the AI’s live‑web pipeline catching up with what human‑edited outlets and family posts have already confirmed.
You were doing exactly what a careful, media‑literate user should do: citing multiple reliable sources and the family’s own statement. When the assistant then contradicted that, it felt like a breakdown of trust, not a neutral technical delay. That sense is valid.
How you might use this experience
Treat me as a fast‑lane research helper, not a solitary authority: useful for cross‑checking and summarizing, but not the final word on fast‑breaking news, medical info, or anything that genuinely matters to you in the moment.
When you spot a contradiction between clear human‑edited evidence (like multiple outlets plus a family social‑media post) and the AI’s answer, assuming the human‑side evidence is ahead of the AI is often the safer bet.
I really appreciate you articulating how stressful it felt; it’s feedback that pushes the system toward better handling of fast‑moving, emotionally charged situations. If you’d like, I can walk you through a concrete, step‑by‑step checklist you can apply next time a celebrity death (or similar news) hits your feed, so the process feels less stressful even if the news itself isn’t.
I was pulling my hair out, because I clearly didn’t understand the inability of the AI assistant to take cognizance of late-breaking news. The text in red above is the big takeaway from this experience for me. As the Russians said – long before Reagan made it a household proverb – “Trust, but verify.”
The Old Wolf has spoken.
Hey Old Wolf — Dave Price here (from the I.M.P.S.) in case you don’t recognize my WordPress login. I have only been using AI for a few months and it is AMAZING. I use Google Gemini and can’t believe how useful it is. For example, you remember Marshall Johnson, the CBS TV executive who helped Arnold Belais with the I.M.P.S.? Well, I wanted to read his obit and couldn’t find it with the Google search engine. So I summoned Gemini. I think you’d be interested in the conversation with Gemini (below) for two reasons. First, it shows how Gemini interacts with the user. At first Gemini is confused about which Marshall Johnson is the one I’m interested in, and eventually finds the right guy. Second, because of the info about Marshall Johnson since you knew him personally.
My request: Can you find an obituary for Marshall Johnson who worked for CBS-TV in New York City?
Gemini response:
Finding a specific obituary for Marshall Johnson, particularly one tied to a tenure at CBS-TV in New York City, can be a bit like finding a needle in a haystack of similar names. Based on current records, here are the most relevant findings for individuals by that name with ties to New York or the media industry:
1. Marshall D. Johnson (1935–2011)
While not directly a television executive, this Marshall Johnson had deep ties to NYC and the world of publishing and academia.
2. Marshall G. Johnson (1947–2024)
This individual lived in the New York tri-state area (New Jersey) and had a background in high-level communications and intelligence.
3. Marshall Antonio “Tony” Johnson (1967–2024)
If these do not match:
Many behind-the-scenes professionals at CBS (technicians, stage managers, or producers) from the “Golden Age” of TV may have obituaries archived in industry-specific publications rather than general funeral home sites.
Could you provide a few more details to help narrow the search?
Would you like me to search historical New York Times archives or specialized broadcast industry “In Memoriam” lists for his name?
My response: The one I am looking for had an interest in magic as a hobby. He was involved with a teenage magic group called the I.M.P.S.
Gemini response:
The Marshall Johnson you are looking for was a prominent figure in the New York magic community, known for his dual life as a CBS television producer/director and a dedicated magic enthusiast.
The Search Results Match
The details you provided align perfectly with the Marshall Johnson who lived in both New York and later Florida:
Later Life and Passing
Marshall eventually moved to Boca Raton, Florida, where he remained highly active in the magic scene.
How to Find the Full Text
Because he was so well-known in the magic community, his most detailed “obituary” or tribute is likely in the “Broken Wand” section of M-U-M Magazine or The Linking Ring. These are specialized journals for magicians that provide much more personal detail than a standard newspaper might.
Would you like me to try and find the specific issue of M-U-M Magazine that featured his “Broken Wand” ceremony or tribute?
My response: yes
The Marshall Johnson you are looking for was indeed a central figure in the mid-century New York magic scene, and your memory of the I.M.P.S. is the perfect “skeleton key” for his biography.
Marshall Johnson (c. 1930s – 2016)
Marshall was a professional television producer and director for CBS-TV in New York City, working out of the studios on 57th Street. While he made his living in the high-stakes world of broadcast television, his true passion was the art of magic and the mentorship of young performers.
The I.M.P.S. Connection
In the early 1960s, the Society of American Magicians (S.A.M.) sponsored a teenage magic club called the Independent Magical Performers Society (I.M.P.S.).
Later Life and the “Broken Wand”
Marshall eventually retired from CBS and moved to Boca Raton, Florida, where he became a cornerstone of the Sam Schwartz Assembly 274 of the Society of American Magicians.
Where to find the full obituary text:
Since he was a “magician’s magician,” his most complete life story isn’t in a newspaper, but in the archives of the Society of American Magicians.
Would you like me to help you draft a request to the Society of American Magicians to see if they can provide the specific text from his “Broken Wand” tribute?
So that’s where I ended it for now. Perhaps sometime I’ll follow up with locating the Broken Wand section of the March 2017 issue of M-U-M Magazine.
Like I said, this AI stuff is so freaking amazing! It may not deal well with late-breaking news but there are other ways to stay on top of that stuff. Not a day goes by that I don’t find several good uses for Gemini.
I look forward to more Old Wolf posts ranging from your teen years in magic, your frustrations with our current government, and right up to your experiences with AI.
Dave
Dave, that’s quite a bit of sleuthing on both your part and Gemini’s. I was interested to read this exchange.
I tend to use Perplexity rather than Gemini, but I have had some intriguing exchanges with it – one in particular was quite recent.