Bernie Sanders on the Senate Floor

May be an image of 1 person and fire

Note: This post is public. If you don’t like what’s being said here, leave your thoughts on your own wall. Comments supportive of MAGA, the GOP, or the Oligarchy will be summarily deleted.

—-

A few hours ago on the floor of the Senate, Bernie Sanders torched billionaires, scorched Trump, and burned every shred of political cowardice in his path.

Here is his fiery speech, word for word:

“Mr. President,

In the last couple of weeks, I’ve had the opportunity to travel in many parts of our country. And I have been able to talk to folks in Nebraska, in Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan, Nevada, Colorado, and Arizona. And what I am hearing from in all of these states and in fact all over the country is that our nation right now faces enormous crises, unprecedented crises in the modern history of our country.

And how right now at this moment we respond to these crises will not only impact our lives, it will impact the lives of our kids and future generations. And in terms of climate change, the well-being of the entire planet.

And Mr. President, what I have to tell you is that the American people are angry at what is happening here in Washington, DC and they are prepared to stand up and fight back. In my view and what I have heard from many, many people is that they will not accept an oligarchic form of society where a handful of billionaires control our government, where the wealthiest person on Earth, Mr. Musk, is running all over Washington, DC slashing the Social Security Administration so that our elderly people today are finding it extremely difficult to access the benefits that they paid into.

Where Mr. Musk and his friends are slashing the Veterans Administration so that people who put their lives on the line to defend us will not be able to get the health care that they are entitled to or get the benefits that they are owed in a timely manner. Slashing the Department of Education. Slashing USAID.

And why is all of this slashing taking place? It is taking place so that the wealthiest people in this country can receive over $1 trillion dollars in tax breaks.

Now, I don’t care if you are a Democrat, a Republican, or an Independent. There are very few people in this country who think that you slash programs that working families desperately need in order to give tax breaks to billionaires.

Mr. President, I am the former chair of the U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and I have had the honor of meeting with veterans in my own state of Vermont—all over Vermont—but all over the country. These are the men and women who put the uniform of this country on and have been prepared to die to defend our nation and American democracy.

And these veterans and Americans all over our nation will not accept an authoritarian form of society with a president who undermines our Constitution every day. Every day there’s something else out there where he’s undermining our Constitution and threatening the very foundations of American democracy. That is not what people fought and died to allow to happen.

Mr. President, I am not a historian, but I do know that the founding fathers of this country were no dummies. They were really smart guys. And in the 1780s, they wrote a Constitution and established a form of government with a separation of powers.

A separation of powers—with an executive branch, the president; a legislative branch, the Congress; and a judicial branch.

These revolutionaries in the 1780s had just fought a war against the imperial rule of the King of England who was an absolute dictator, the most powerful person on Earth. And these revolutionaries here in America forming a new government wanted to make absolutely sure that no one person in this brand new country that they were forming would have unlimited powers.

And that is why we have a separation of powers. That is why we have a judiciary, a Congress, and an executive branch. In other words, way back in the 1780s, they wrote a Constitution to prevent exactly what Donald Trump is trying to do today.

So, let us be clear about what is going on. Donald Trump is attacking our First Amendment and is trying to intimidate the media and those who speak out against him in an absolutely unprecedented way.

Mr. President, he has sued ABC, CBS, Meta, the Des Moines Register. His FCC is now threatening to investigate NPR and PBS. He has called CNN and MSNBC “illegal.”

In other words, the leader—or the so-called leader—of the free world is afraid of freedom. He doesn’t like criticism. Well, guess what? None of us like criticism. But you don’t get elected to the Senate, you don’t get elected to the House, you don’t become a governor, you don’t become a president of the United States unless you are prepared to deal with that criticism.

And the response to that criticism in a democracy is not to sue the media, is not to intimidate the media. It’s to respond in the way you think best.

But Mr. President, it is not just the media that Trump is going after. He is going after the constitutional responsibilities that this body, the United States Congress, has. And I will say it amazes me, it really does, how easily my Republican colleagues here in the Senate and in the House are willing to surrender their constitutional responsibilities. Give it over to the president.

Trump has illegally and unconstitutionally withheld funds that Congress has appropriated. You can’t do that. Congress has the power of the purse. We make a decision. We argue about it here. Big debates, vote-aras, the whole thing. Make that decision. That money goes out. The president does not have the right to withhold funds that Congress has appropriated.

Trump has illegally and unconstitutionally decimated agencies that can only be changed or reformed by Congress. You don’t like the Department of Education, you don’t like USAID, fine. Come to the Congress. Tell us what reforms you want to see. You do not have the right to unilaterally do away with these agencies.

Trump has fired members of independent agencies and inspectors general that he does not have the authority to do.

But Mr. President, it is not just the media that he is trying to intimidate. It is not just the powers of Congress that he wants.

Now, in an absolutely outrageous, unconstitutional and extraordinarily dangerous way, he is going after the judiciary. His view is that if you don’t like a decision that a judge renders, you get rid of that judge. You try to impeach that judge. You intimidate judges so that you get the decisions that you want.

You know, I’m thinking back now as someone who is not a supporter of the Roberts court, and I’m thinking about one of the worst Supreme Court decisions that has ever been rendered—that is Citizens United. I’ll say more about that in a moment. And I’m thinking about the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, taking away American women’s right to control their own bodies.

In my view, these were outrageous decisions, unpopular decisions. But it never occurred to me, because maybe I’m old-fashioned and conservative, and I believe that you live by the rule of law, to say, “Hey, look at the decision Roberts made. We’re going to impeach him.”

No, we try to elect a new president who’s going to appoint new Supreme Court justices. That is the system that people have fought and died to defend.

But it’s not just the movement toward oligarchy, which is outraging millions of Americans—Democrats and Republicans, by the way—and it’s not just the movement toward authoritarianism that we are seeing. The American people, especially with Mr. Musk and 13 billionaires in the Trump administration running agency after agency…

The American people are saying as loudly as they can that they will not accept a society of massive economic and wealth inequalities, where the very richest people in our country are becoming much richer while working families are struggling to put food on the table.

Having gone all over this country, I can tell you that the American people are sick and tired of these inequalities and they want an economy that works for all of us—not just the 1%.

You know, Mr. President, we deal with a whole lot of stuff here in the Congress, and you know, virtually all of it is important in one way or another.

But let’s do something, you know, fairly radical today. Let’s try to tell the truth—the real truth—about what is going on in our society today. Something that we don’t talk about too much here in the Senate. We don’t talk about it too much in the House. We don’t talk about it too much in the corporate media.

But the reality is that today we have two Americas. Two very, very different Americas.

And in one of those Americas, the wealthiest people have never ever had it so good. In the whole history of our country, the people on top have never ever had it so good as they have it today.

Today, we have more income and wealth inequality than there has ever been in the history of America. Now, I know we don’t discuss it. You don’t see it much on TV. You don’t hear it talked about here at all. But the American people do not believe that it is appropriate that three people—one, two, three—Mr. Musk, Mr. Bezos, and Mr. Zuckerberg, three Americans, own more wealth than the bottom half of American society. 170 million people. Really? Three people own more wealth than 170 million people? Anybody here think that is vaguely appropriate?

And by the way, those very same three people—the three richest people in America—were right there at Trump’s inaugural, standing right behind the president. So, you want to know what oligarchy is? I know there’s some confusion out there. What is oligarchy? Well, it starts off when you have the three wealthiest people in the country standing right behind the president when he gets inaugurated.

The top 1% in our country now own more wealth than the bottom 90%.

CEOs make 300 times more than their average worker.

And unbelievably—real inflation-accounted-for wages today—the average American worker, if you can believe it, despite a massive increase in worker productivity, is lower today than it was 52 years ago. And during that period, there was a $75 trillion transfer of wealth that went from the bottom 90% to the top 1%. That is the reality of the American economy today. And you know what? Maybe we might want to be talking about that.

And in our America today, in that top America, that one America, the 1% are completely separate and isolated from the rest of the country. You think they get on a subway to get to work? Think they sit in a traffic jam for an hour trying to get to work? Not the case.

They fly around in the jets and the helicopters that they own. They live in their mansions all over the world in their gated communities. They have nannies taking care of their babies. They don’t worry about the cost of child care. And they send their kids to the best private schools and colleges.

Sometimes they vacation not in a Motel 6, not in a national park, but on the very own islands that they have. And on occasion, for the very very richest—just to have for a kick, have a little bit of fun—maybe they’ll spend a few million dollars flying off into space in one of their own spaceships. Sounds like fun.

But it is not just massive income and wealth inequality that we’re dealing with today. We have more concentration of ownership than ever before. While the profits on Wall Street and corporate America soar, a handful of giant corporations dominate sector after sector—whether it’s agriculture, transportation, media, financial services, etc., etc.

Small number of huge corporations—international corporations—dominating sector after sector. And as a result of that concentration of ownership, they are able to charge the American people outrageously high prices for the goods and services we need.

Mr. President, we don’t talk about it too much. Maybe we should. But there are three Wall Street firms—BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street—that combined are the major stockholders in 95% of our corporations. Got that? Three Wall Street firms—three—are the major stockholders in 95% of American corporations.

So, Mr. President, that is one America. People on top doing phenomenally well. Not only do they have economic power, they have enormous political power. That’s what’s going on there. They live like kings. That’s one America.

But there is another America.

And in that other America, 60% of our people are living paycheck to paycheck. And millions of workers from one end of this country to the other are trying to survive on starvation wages.

And unlike Donald Trump, I grew up in a family that lived paycheck to paycheck. And I know the anxieties that my mom and dad had, living in a rent-controlled apartment. Can we afford to buy this? Why did you buy that?

And that’s the story taking place all over America.

What does living paycheck to paycheck mean?

It means that every single day, millions of Americans worry about how they’re going to pay their rent or their mortgage. All over the country, rents are skyrocketing. And people are wondering: What happens—what happens to me and my kids if rent goes up by 20% and I can’t afford it? Where do I live? Do I have to take my kid out of school? Where do I put my kid? In worst case scenario, do I live in my car?

Let’s be clear. There are many people who are working today who are living in the back of their cars.

How do I pay for child care?

I talked to a cop, a guy the other day—a police officer—spending $20,000 a year for child care.

How do I buy decent food for my kids when the price of groceries is off the charts?

What happens if I get sick or my kid gets sick or my mother gets sick and I got a $12,000 deductible and I can’t afford to go to the doctor?

How, at the end of the month, am I going to pay my credit card bill—even though I am being charged 20 or 30% interest rates by the usurious credit card companies?

People are worrying about simple things. What happens if my car breaks down and the guy at the repair shop says it’s going to cost $1,000 and I don’t have $1,000 in the bank? And if I don’t have a car, how do I get to work? And if I don’t get to work, how do I have an income? And if I don’t have an income, how do I take care of my family?

Those are the crises that millions of Americans are experiencing today.

But it’s not just working-age Americans.

Today, in our country, half of older workers—older workers—have nothing in the bank as they face retirement. And they’re watching TV and they’re saying, “Mr. Musk is firing Social Security workers,” and actually worrying whether Social Security will be there for them.

And it’s not just older workers with nothing in the bank wondering what happens when they retire. Twenty-two percent of seniors are trying to survive on $15,000 a year.

I dare anybody in this country—let alone somebody who’s old, who needs health care, needs to keep the house warm—try to survive on $15,000 a year. And there are people here, by the way, talking about cutting Social Security.

Mr. President, it is not just about income and wealth inequality. It is about a health care system which everyone in the nation understands is broken, is dysfunctional, and is outrageously expensive.

I hear my Republican friends—you know, I don’t know where they are today—wanting to destroy the ACA. And my Democratic friends say, “Oh, we got to defend the ACA.” ACA is broken. It doesn’t work.

In my state, the cost of health care is going up 10, 15%. In America today, you got 85 million people uninsured or underinsured.

Function of the health care system today is not to do what a sane society would do—guarantee health care to all people in a cost-effective way—something which, by the way, every other major nation on Earth manages to do.

The function of our health care system, as everybody knows, is to make billions of dollars in profits for the insurance companies and the drug companies.

So I say to my Democratic friends: It’s not good enough to defend the Affordable Care Act. It’s a broken system. You got to have the guts to stand up and allow us to do what every other major nation does—guarantee health care to all people as a human right—not allow the drug companies and the insurance companies to make massive profits every year.

And Mr. President, I want to touch on an issue that gets virtually no discussion, but I think it is enormously important—and it says a hell of a lot about what’s going on in our society today.

In America, according to international studies, our life expectancy—how long we live as a people—is about four years lower than other countries. Most European countries—people there live longer lives. Japan—they live even more longer lives than in Europe.

So, question number one: Why is that happening?

We spend $14,000 a year per person on health care—almost double what any other country spends. And yet people around the world are living, on average, four years longer than we do.

But here is the really ugly fact—even worse than that.

And that is that in this country, on average, if you are a working-class person, you will live seven years shorter lives than if you’re in the top 1%. If you’re a working-class person, your life will be seven years shorter than if you are wealthy.

In other words, being poor or working-class in America today amounts to a death sentence.

Mr. President, it’s not only a broken health care system.

We have got to ask ourselves a simple question—and the Biden administration began a little bit of movement in this direction—and that is: Why are we living in a nation where one out of four people can’t even afford the prescription drugs their doctors prescribe?

Why are we in some cases paying ten times more than our neighbors in Canada or in Europe? How does that happen?

And the answer of course has to do with the greed of the pharmaceutical industry and their power right here—all of the campaign contributions that they make—which has prevented us from negotiating prices.

But it’s not just health care or prescription drugs.

When we look at what’s going on in America—in Vermont and throughout this country—we have a major housing crisis. Here we are, the richest country on Earth: 800,000 people sleeping out on the streets, and 20 million people are spending more than 50% of their limited incomes on housing.

Can you imagine that? You’re a working person, spending 50% of your income on housing. How do you have money to do anything else? And the cost of housing is soaring.

Do not tell me, Mr. President, that in a nation which could spend a trillion dollars on the military—a nation that gives massive tax breaks to the rich—that we cannot build the millions of units of housing that we desperately need.

So, Mr. President, why is all of this happening?

Why do we have a health care system that is broken? Prescription drugs that are the most expensive in the world? A housing system? Education in deep trouble?

Talked to educators in Vermont, all over the country. Talked to a principal the other day from Vermont. Their starting salary at a public school? $32,000 a year. But don’t worry—they can’t afford to even bring people in because they can’t afford the housing in the community.

Why have we let education sink to the level that it has?

So I think the bottom line of all this is: The American people, I think, are catching on. And Mr. Musk—I must thank him—because he has made it very clear we are living in an oligarchic form of society.

If anybody out there thinks that Mr. Musk is running around out of the goodness of his heart trying to make our government more efficient, you have not a clue as to what is going on.

What these guys want to do is destroy virtually every federal program that impacts the well-being of working people—Social Security, Medicare, postal service, public education, you name it—so they can get huge tax breaks for the rich and eventually make government so inefficient that they will have the ability, as large corporations, to come in and privatize everything that is going on.

So, Mr. President, this is a pivotal moment in American history. And I sense that the American people have had it up to here.

They are prepared to fight back.

They do not want a government run by billionaires who have it all—whose greed is uncontrollable.

You know, we have in Vermont—and I think a lot of this country—serious problems with addiction, with drugs. People drinking too much alcohol. People smoking too many cigarettes.

But the worst form of addiction that this country now faces is the greed of the oligarchy.

You might think that if you had 10, 20 billion dollars, it would be enough. You know—kind of enough to let your family live for the next 20 generations.

But it’s not.

For whatever reason—whatever compulsive reason they have—these guys want more and more and more, and they are prepared to destroy Social Security, Medicare, nutrition programs for hungry people in order to get even more.

That, to me, is disgusting.

So, Mr. President, we are at a pivotal moment in American history. But having been all over this country—or many parts of this country—I am absolutely confident that the American people (and I’m not just talking about Democrats, who are as complicit in the problems that we have right now as our Republicans, because we got a two-party system which is basically corrupt)…

You got Mr. Musk over on the Republican side saying to any Republican who dares to stand up and defy the Trump agenda, we are going to primary you.

And on the Democratic side, you got AIPAC and you got other super PACs saying, you stand up for working people—you’re in trouble as well.

We got a corrupt campaign finance system in which billionaires are able to buy elections. And that’s why all over this country, people are not happy with our two-party system—the Republicans and the Democrats.

So, Mr. President, this is a pivotal moment in American history.

But we have had difficult moments before. And I am confident, from the bottom of my heart, that if we stand together, and we do not allow some right-wing extremists to divide us up by the color of our skin, or our religion, or where we were born, or our sexual orientation…

If we stand together, we can save this country. We can defeat oligarchy. We can defeat the movement toward authoritarianism. And in fact, we can create an economy and a government that works for all—not just a few.”

—-

This nation needs more Bernies. More AOC’s. More people with good hearts and common sense who are willing to stand up to the fascists, the dictators, and the oligarchs who are raping our country for their own enrichment.

The Old Wolf has Spoken

Happy Pie Day!

i 8 sum apple Pi

It’s March 14, the day on which we celebrate pie and pi, the magical number reduced to its simplest form as 3.14.

“Apple pie. Green apples sliced thin. Lard, flour, salt, water to bind. Sugar, cinnamon, a dab of butter. Three slashes on the crust, one for steam and two because your momma did it that way.”

Jebediah Nightlinger, “The Cowboys”

Classic Apple Pie

My wife makes a killer deep-dish apple pie. I have never tasted better.

Pie comes in all shapes and sizes. Whoopie Pies are a Maine specialty.

Pie Chart

And who doesn’t love pie?

Everyone loves pie.¹ (Artwork by Paul Taylor, Wapsi Square)

But it is possible to have too much. (Art by Charles Addams)

Then it’s best to decline the offer.
Do you want to have a piece of pie? I better not, thank you.²

They’ve been making pie the same way out in the country for centuries. (Art by B. Kliban)

Except for Pumpkin Pie. They have a special way of getting that one.

Sadly, pie was not always universally valued.

But these day folks get pretty enthusiastic about pie. (Weebl and Bob Art by Jonti Picking)

And just so you can make your own, here’s a recipe for apple pie from scratch. Don’t forget to invent the universe.

Happy Pie day to one and all!

The Old Wolf has spoken.

Footnotes

¹ If you’re one of those poor unfortunates who doesn’t like pie, you have my sympathy.

² U one-half P sub Pi? i beta-nought, TanQ.

I’m glad I’m a Hufflepuff

Way back in the dark ages when Pottermore was launched, I signed up and was sorted into a house like everyone else. Of course I was hoping I’d be put in to Gryffindor because of the usual reasons, but the Sorting Hat told me I’d do best in Hufflepuff. At the time I was disappointed, but decades later I came to understand that I had been signally honored.

Snacks? Naps? Honor and decency? Service? Loyalty? Building a world that works for everyone, with no one left out? I’m all in. I mean, just look at this common room:

J.K. Rowling’s original writing at Pottermore:

“The Hufflepuff common room is entered from the same corridor as the Hogwarts kitchens. Proceeding past the large still life that forms the entrance to the latter, a pile of large barrels is to be found stacked in a shadowy stone recess on the right-hand side of the corridor.
The barrel two from the bottom, middle of the second row, will open if tapped in the rhythm of ‘Helga Hufflepuff’*.

* The complexity or otherwise of the entrance to the common rooms might be said to give a very rough idea of the intellectual reputation of each house: Hufflepuff has an unchanging portal and requires rhythmic tapping; Slytherin and Gryffindor have doorways that challenge the would-be entrant about equally, the former having an almost imperceptible hidden entrance and a varying password, the latter having a capricious guardian and frequently changing passwords. In keeping with its reputation as the house of the most agile minds at Hogwarts, the door to the Ravenclaw common room presents a fresh intellectual or philosophical challenge every time a person knocks on it.

As a security device to repel non-Hufflepuffs, tapping on the wrong barrel, or tapping the incorrect number of times, results in one of the other lids bursting off and drenching the interloper in vinegar.

A sloping, earthy passage inside the barrel travels upwards a little way until a cosy, round, low-ceilinged room is revealed, reminiscent of a badger’s sett. The room is decorated in the cheerful, bee-like colours of yellow and black, emphasised by the use of highly polished, honey-coloured wood for the tables and the round doors which lead to the boys’ and girls’ dormitories (furnished with comfortable wooden bedsteads, all covered in patchwork quilts).

A colourful profusion of plants and flowers seem to relish the atmosphere of the Hufflepuff common room: various cactii stand on wooden circular shelves (curved to fit the walls), many of them waving and dancing at passers-by, while copper-bottomed plant holders dangling amid the ceiling cause tendrils of ferns and ivies to brush your hair as you pass under them.

A portrait over the wooden mantelpiece (carved all over with decorative dancing badgers) shows Helga Hufflepuff, one of the four founders of Hogwarts School, toasting her students with a tiny, two-handled golden cup. Small, round windows just level with the ground at the foot of the castle show a pleasant view of rippling grass and dandelions, and, occasionally, passing feet. These low windows notwithstanding, the room feels perennially sunny.

Nevertheless, it ought not to be concluded from the above that Hufflepuffs are dimwits or duffers, though they have been cruelly caricatured that way on occasion. Several outstanding brains have emerged from Hufflepuff house over the centuries; these fine minds simply happened to be allied to outstanding qualities of patience, a strong work ethic and constancy, all traditional hallmarks of Hufflepuff House.

Author’s note
When I first planned the series, I expected Harry to visit all four house common rooms during his time at Hogwarts. There came a point when I realised that there was never going to be a valid reason to enter the Hufflepuff room. Nevertheless, it is quite as real to me as the other three, and I always knew exactly where those Hufflepuffs were going when they headed off towards the kitchens after lessons.” 

Hufflepuff is full of some of the most honorable characters:

Yeah. Badgers for the win!

The Old Wolf has spoken.

WHY SOME TRUMP SUPPORTERS WILL GO DOWN WITH THE SHIP

Re-blogging this because it’s a good read – clear, cogent, and accurate.

“There are two kinds of people who voted for Donald J. Trump in 2024. The first group was conned—they bought the sales pitch, got burned, and are just now starting to realize they were used. Veterans who lost their jobs, farmers who went bankrupt, blue-collar workers whose towns never saw the economic boom Trump promised—they’re pissed off, and rightfully so.

But then there’s the second group.

The ones who will never wake up. The ones who, no matter how many times Trump lies, betrays, fails, or humiliates them, will stand by him until the bitter end. They will make excuses, twist logic into knots, ignore reality, and cling to their delusions with both hands—because admitting the truth would break them.

These people aren’t victims of Trump anymore. They’re willing participants in their own destruction.”

Read the full post at Closer to the Edge on Substack.

The Old Wolf has recommended

:

Pro-trump propaganda: A rebuttal (Long)

Warning! Wall of Text!

This post crossed my screen a couple of weeks ago, and after a bit of research I discovered it’s being shared across multiple channels on Facebook and elsewhere. It’s so outrageous in its content that I couldn’t sleep much last night, so I was compelled in the name of decency to offer a fact-based rebuttal. I won’t name and shame the author, because that’s not my privilege, but it’s out there if you want to search for it. Original text in italics, my responses follow.


𝐼’𝑚 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑙𝑘𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑤ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑎𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛. 𝑆𝑜 𝐼 𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝐼’𝑑 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑠.

“Whining” about the Trump administration is, more properly stated, resisting autocracy, oligarchy, and a rising tide of fascism that needs to be fought at every turn. Consider these points:

  1. 𝐴𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑖𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑝 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑤𝑒 (𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓) 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔, 𝑚𝑖𝑑𝑑𝑙𝑒 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝐴𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑠 𝑤𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑑. 𝑊𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑐 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑦 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑤𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑒.

Donald Trump has absolutely no mandate, given that 75,019,230 Americans voted for reason, sanity, and compassion instead of madness and oligarchy. Trump’s 77,303,568 votes constitute a razor-thin margin of 1.48%, or 2,284,338 people – less than the population of Houston, Texas.¹

In our nation, Republican-leaning states take more in federal dollars than they contribute, where Democratic-leaning states provide more tax revenue to the nation than they get back, so please don’t tell us that Republicans are “pulling the economic weight in this country.”²

  1. 𝐼𝑓 𝑦𝑜𝑢 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑛’𝑡 𝑎𝑙𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑦, 𝑔𝑒𝑡 𝑎 𝑗𝑜𝑏. 𝐸𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦 𝑏𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑦 𝑖𝑠 ℎ𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔. 𝐴𝑛𝑑 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑔𝑒𝑡 𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑑 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑜. 𝐴𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑛, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑎𝑑𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑛. 𝐼𝑡’𝑠 𝑎𝑛 𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑧𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡.

More than 1/3 of Americans have a second job or side-hustle just to survive.³ In 2020, 4.1% of our nation was classified as “working poor,” people who have jobs but still fall below the poverty line.⁴ The old GOP line about “pull yourself up by your bootstraps” is a cruel philosophy that leads to things like opposing the cancellation of student debt. “I had to pay off mine, why should other [implied: undeserving] people sponge off my taxes?” In Romanian, they say “să moară și capra vecinului” (may the neighbor’s goat die too), expressing a desire for others to suffer if you cannot thrive yourself, a feeling that is inherently worse than Schadenfreude.⁵ “Wage theft is a costly and pervasive problem that affects millions of workers across the country. For example, Cooper and Kroeger (2017) investigated just one type of wage theft (minimum wage violations) and found that in the 10 most populous states in the country, 17% of eligible low-wage workers reported being paid less than the minimum wage, amounting to 2.4 million workers losing $8 billion annually. Extrapolating from these 10 states, Cooper and Kroeger estimated that workers throughout the country lose $15 billion annually from minimum wage violations alone.”⁶ “According to the Economic Policy Institute, wage theft costs U.S. workers as much as $50 billion per year — a number far higher than all robberies, burglaries and motor vehicle thefts combined.”⁷

  1. 𝑈𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑖𝑓 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑎 𝑈.𝑆. 𝐶𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑛, 𝑜𝑟 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑦 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑎 𝑈.𝑆. 𝐶𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑔𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡𝑜 𝑔𝑒𝑡 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑑! 𝐼 𝑑𝑜𝑛’𝑡 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑤ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑓𝑎𝑣𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑙 𝑠𝑎𝑦𝑠.

The fact that you don’t care what “liberal media channels” say doesn’t change reality. American citizens are being caught up in Donald Trump’s sweep for undocumented immigrants. It’s happening, it will continue to happen as long as ICE is given carte blanche by the current administration and MAGA-dominated Congress.⁸

  1. 𝑇𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑎 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑐ℎ𝑖𝑝. 𝑊ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑏𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑚𝑎𝑘𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑠, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑦𝑜𝑢 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑦 ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑏𝑎𝑙𝑙. 𝑇ℎ𝑎𝑡’𝑠 ℎ𝑜𝑤 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑔𝑒𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑠 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑟𝑒.

International trade is not a zero-sum game. You don’t have to have a winner and a loser – the best deals are made when everyone wins. Sadly, Donald Trump – and hence MAGA – believe something entirely different: “You hear lots of people say that a great deal is when both sides win,” he writes in Think Big and Kick Ass, co-authored with Bill Zanker of the Learning Annex. “That is a bunch of crap. In a great deal you win — not the other side. You crush the opponent and come away with something better for yourself.” To “crush the other side and take the benefits,” he declares, is “better than sex — and I love sex.”⁹ In other words, it’s not enough for Donald Trump to win – 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑠𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑒. Treat business collaborations or international relations in this cruel and narcissistic manner and you will only generate one thing – massive resentment and a decreased desire to do any business in the future. That’s not winning – it’s self-sabotage in the long run.

  1. 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝐶𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑙 𝑅𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑠 𝐴𝑐𝑡 𝑜𝑓 1964 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑏𝑦 𝑎𝑔𝑒, 𝑠𝑒𝑥, 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑒, 𝑒𝑡𝑐. 𝐷𝐸𝐼 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠. 𝐷𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑠 𝑤𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑡𝑜 𝑏𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑒.

If you think the Civil Rights Act has eliminated racism in America, you are living on your veranda, sipping mint juleps while the “darkies” work happily in the fields. The Brookings Institute, writing about systemic racism in America, said “The reality of this history has been on stark display in recent weeks. From the terrible killings of George Floyd and Ahmaud Arbery, to the countless, untold acts of racism that take place every day across America, these are the issues that are defining the moment—just as our response will define who we are and will be in the 21st century and beyond. Truly, the very nature of our “national soul” is at stake, and we all have a deep responsibility to be a part of the solution.”¹⁰

“At this point, it’s evident that DEI has become interchangeable with a less socially acceptable racial slur” – specifically, the “N-word.”¹¹ And sadly, discrimination across the board which remains endemic in our society and which Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity, and DEI attempt to combat includes not just people of color but women and all sorts of minorities as well.

  1. 𝐼𝑡’𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡’𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑦, 𝑖𝑡’𝑠 𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑦. 𝑌𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑦 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑔𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑎 𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑛 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡 ℎ𝑜𝑤 𝑖𝑡 𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑡.

This is 100% true – and it’s why Trump and Company want to eliminate all financial oversight, such as the elimination of organizations like Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.¹²

  1. 𝑊𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑊𝑜𝑟𝑙𝑑 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑘. 𝐼𝑓 𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑒𝑑 ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑝 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟 𝑜𝑤𝑛 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑠. 𝐼 𝑑𝑜𝑛’𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑛𝑦 ℎ𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑦 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝐼𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑜𝑟 𝐶ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑎.

Despite the fact that Colin Turnbull’s analysis of the Ik in his book 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑀𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝑃𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒 has widely been discredited, Lewis Thomas in his seminal work 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝐿𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝐶𝑒𝑙𝑙 wrote: “For total greed, rapacity, heartlessness, and irresponsibility there is nothing to match a nation. Nations, by law, are solitary, self-centred, withdrawn into themselves…. They bawl insults from their doorsteps, defecate into whole oceans, snatch all the food, survive by detestation, take joy in the bad luck of others, celebrate the death of others, live for the death of others.”¹³

America is not an island, and as the world’s wealthiest nation we have done more than our fair share to assist the global community in many ways, which is only right and proper. The Brookings institute soundly refutes many myths about foreign aid, including “America spends too much on foreign aid,”(foreign assistance is less than 1 percent of the federal budget), “Others don’t do their fair share,” (There is a broad international commitment that wealthy countries should provide annually 0.7 percent of GNP to assist poor countries. Five countries (Norway, Sweden, Luxembourg, Denmark, and the U.K.) exceed that benchmark. The average for all wealthy nations is around 0.4 percent. The U.S. ranks near the bottom at below 0.2 percent), and “U.S. foreign aid is mainly backed by Democrats” (Foreign aid historically has been viewed more as a Democratic than Republican program. The Marshall Plan was initiated by the Truman administration, and in the 1990s, when votes in the Congress on foreign aid spending were close, the appropriations bill garnered more Democratic than Republican votes. But every president, Democratic and Republican, until the current occupant of the White House, has been a strong proponent of foreign assistance. In fact, some of the most rapid increases in foreign aid have come during Republican presidencies)¹⁴

The shuttering of USAID will literally kill people, and it’s unbelievably cruel and xenophobic. “The Roman Catholic Church’s worldwide charity arm sharply criticized President Donald Trump’s cuts to U.S. foreign aid on Monday, saying his plans to end funding for relief agency USAID will have a “catastrophic” impact in the developing world. ‘The ruthless and chaotic way this callous decision is being implemented threatens the lives and dignity of millions,” Caritas Internationalis, a Vatican-based confederation of 162 Catholic relief, development and social services organisations working in more than 200 countries, said in a statement.'”¹⁵

  1. 𝐷𝑟𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑏𝑎𝑏𝑦, 𝑑𝑟𝑖𝑙𝑙. 𝑊𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑡𝑜 𝑘𝑛𝑜𝑤 𝑤ℎ𝑦? 𝐵𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑤𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑖𝑡. 𝐴𝑟𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒? 𝑁𝑜𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚. 𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑤𝑎𝑦 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑖𝑙 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 𝑙𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑢𝑚, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑖𝑠? 𝐶ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑎. 𝑊𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑑 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑤𝑛? 𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑤𝑛. 𝐴𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑠 𝑜𝑖𝑙, 𝑔𝑎𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑎𝑙, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑛𝑢𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟. 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝑤𝑜𝑛’𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑟!

First of all, your data is incorrect. The world’s leader in lithium production is Australia, followed by Chile. China is only third.¹⁶ Your quote about unicorn farts and liberal tears sounds like something you’d hear on Breitbart or OAN or Fox News, and is petty and childish. Europe is the world’s leader in replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy sources, and is on track to reach a target of a 42.5% share of renewables by 2030.¹⁷ It can be done if the social and political will is there, but in the USA the fossil-fuel lobby is immensely wealthy and powerful, and our legislators receive massive amounts of money to ensure that renewable energy is consistently sidelined in favor of more drilling and coal digging.¹⁸

For what it’s worth, it’s worth mentioning in the service of full disclosure:

    O=c=O O=c=O O=c=O O=c=O O=c=O O=c=O O=c=O O=c=O O=c=O
     THIS POST MOVED STICKY BLACK FILTH FROM THE BOWELS
        OF THE EARTH, AND SET IT ON FIRE IN YOUR AIR
    O=c=O O=c=O O=c=O O=c=O O=c=O O=c=O O=c=O O=c=O O=c=O

On the other hand, 15% of my energy consumption comes from a solar farm in Maine, and similarly did for many years in Utah thanks to their Blue Sky program. It can be done, and people who care about our environment will continue to fight the fossil fuel industries’ dominance.

One point on which we agree: Nuclear power has been given a bad rap, and we need more of it – along with increased research and development on how to reduce or treat nuclear ash.

  1. 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑦 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑦 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑟 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑓𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠, 𝑔𝑒𝑡 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑡.

R. Buckminster Fuller, one of the world’s greatest forward thinkers and the inventor of the geodesic dome, had a philosophy that came to be known as the “World Game” – “Make the world work, for 100% of humanity, in the shortest possible time, through spontaneous cooperation, without ecological offense or the disadvantage of anyone.”¹⁹ Historically, progressives have aligned themselves with this concept in various ways, while regressives – those in favor of preserving a world where only the wealthy and influential have rights – have sought to accumulate power and build walls to keep the “unworthy” out.

A big subset of MAGA today are evangelical Christians who wear their religion on their sleeves, who in the words of Paul the Apostle are “having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.” (New Testament, 2 Timothy 3:5)

Russell Moore, long one of the top officials in the Southern Baptist Convention, said “Well, it was the result of having multiple pastors tell me essentially the same story about quoting the Sermon on the Mount parenthetically in their preaching – turn the other cheek – to have someone come up after and to say, where did you get those liberal talking points? And what was alarming to me is that in most of these scenarios, when the pastor would say, I’m literally quoting Jesus Christ, the response would not be, I apologize. The response would be, yes, but that doesn’t work anymore. That’s weak. And when we get to the point where the teachings of Jesus himself are seen as subversive to us, then we’re in a crisis.”²⁰

It is only the feelings of people – whether from doing their best to follow the teachings of Jesus, or from a humanistic sense of wanting the best for the greatest number of people – that will help humanity crawl out of the mud and reach for the stars, by building a world that works for everyone, with no one left out. And we will never “get over” that.

  1. 𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑤𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛. 𝑆𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡.

Sure, if you want to base your opinions solely on the Bible or what you’re hearing over the pulpit instead of science. In reality, it’s not simple at all.

“Sex can be much more complicated than it at first seems. According to the simple scenario, the presence or absence of a Y chromosome is what counts: with it, you are male, and without it, you are female. But doctors have long known that some people straddle the boundary—their sex chromosomes say one thing, but their gonads (ovaries or testes) or sexual anatomy say another. Parents of children with these kinds of conditions—known as intersex conditions, or differences or disorders of sex development (DSDs)—often face difficult decisions about whether to bring up their child as a boy or a girl. Some researchers now say that as many as 1 person in 100 has some form of DSD. When genetics is taken into consideration, the boundary between the sexes becomes even blurrier. Scientists have identified many of the genes involved in the main forms of DSD, and have uncovered variations in these genes that have subtle effects on a person’s anatomical or physiological sex.”²¹

Even if you want to discount the science, which is a terrible thing to do²², people need to understand that LGBTQIA+ people have always existed, they will always exist, and no amount of oppression or erasure will stop them from existing. Gay rights are human rights. Trans rights are human rights. There’s no question that inclusion and respect for non-binary people brings social challenges and demands difficult adjustments, but to do anything else – especially to work to strip rights from your fellow sojourners in mortality – is in direct opposition to the teachings that most MAGA adherents claim to honor: “That which is distasteful unto yourself, do not unto others – this is the whole Torah, the rest is commentary.” (Rabbi Hillel).

  1. 𝐸𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑠ℎ 𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑎 𝑐ℎ𝑖𝑙𝑑 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙, 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑙𝑑. 𝐴𝑛𝑦𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑒𝑙𝑠𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑤𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑔.

“The modern education system was designed to teach future factory workers to be “punctual, docile, and sober.”²³ 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 is what’s wrong, and utterly so. In 1928, Margaret Mead, an American Cultural Anthropologist, was famously reported saying, “Children should be taught how to think, and not what to think.” It turns out she was way ahead of her time and was already tapping into a theory that educational psychologists would later term ‘Metacognition’.²⁴ For societal progression to occur, children need to be taught more than reading, writing, and arithmetic – they need to learn critical thinking, social consciousness, and life skills as well, and they need music, literature, world history, and the arts.²⁵ And they definitely don’t need religious indoctrination, as specified in the Establishment Clause of our nation’s Constitution. Public funds must be used for public education, not private religious institutions. If people want their children to attend such schools, they should pay for them out of their own pockets, not via tax-supported vouchers.

  1. 𝐷𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑑 𝐽. 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑖𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑜𝑛 𝑏𝑦 𝑎 𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑠𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑒 — 𝑏𝑜𝑡ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑒. 𝐺𝑒𝑡 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑡.

In 2020, Joseph Biden won the popular vote by a margin of 4.45%, and for 4 years MAGA screamed “Not my President!” in 2024, Trump won the popular vote by a margin of 1.48%. In 1972, Richard Nixon’s margin over George McGovern was 23.15%; 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 was a landslide, despite Nixon’s later disgrace and resignation. Trump has no mandate for anything despite what you might hear on Fox News. It’s worth mentioning that the “electorial” (sic) college has long been recognized as an outdated construct designed to preserve the power of white landowners²⁶ and deserves to be replaced by a one-person, one vote Presidential election. Yes, even if this had been the case in 2024, Donald Trump would have won the election, but the results would have been entirely different in 2000 (Bush/Gore) and 2016 (Trump/Clinton) and Trump would never have ascended to the presidency at all.²⁷

¹ https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/elections/2024
² https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2023/07/red-states-feed-at-the-federal-trough-blue-states-supply-the-feed.html
³ https://www.newsweek.com/americans-side-hustles-survey-1930416
https://www.newsweek.com/vault/banking/savings/gen-z-money-habits-bank-of-america-survey/
https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/working-poor/2020/
https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/2023/06/we-must-banish-bootstraps-mythology-from-american-life
https://www.epi.org/publication/wage-theft-2021/
https://inthesetimes.com/article/wage-theft-union-labor-biden-iupat
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/trump-immigration-raids-citizens-profiling-accusations-native-american-rcna189203
https://www.vox.com/a/donald-trump-books
¹⁰ https://www.brookings.edu/articles/systemic-racism-and-america-today/
¹¹ https://archive.ph/5TPDb (archived from http://readcultured.com/how-white-people-quickly-turned-dei-into-a-racist-slur-1866e4e3dedd)
¹² https://www.aa.com.tr/en/americas/us-senator-vows-to-fight-back-against-trumps-plan-to-dismantle-financial-watchdog/3478108
¹³ https://www.goodnews.ie/betweenourselvesjune2005.shtml
¹⁴ https://www.brookings.edu/articles/what-every-american-should-know-about-u-s-foreign-aid/
¹⁵ https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trumps-foreign-aid-cuts-catastrophic-says-global-catholic-charity-arm-2025-02-10/
¹⁶ https://www.sustainabilitybynumbers.com/p/lithium-electric-vehicles
¹⁷ https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/share-of-energy-consumption-from
¹⁸ https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/summary?cycle=all&ind=E01&mem=Y&recipdetail=S
¹⁹ https://www.bfi.org/about-fuller/big-ideas/world-game/
²⁰ https://www.npr.org/2023/08/05/1192374014/russell-moore-on-altar-call-for-evangelical-america
²¹ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-redefined-the-idea-of-2-sexes-is-overly-simplistic1/
²² https://aphelis.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/ASIMOV_1980_Cult_of_Ignorance.pdf The salient quote here from Isaac Asimov is this: “There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.”
²³ https://qz.com/1314814/universal-education-was-first-promoted-by-industrialists-who-wanted-docile-factory-workers
²⁴ https://coachbit.com/the-parent-bit/metacognition-reflective-learning-can-help-kids-perform-better/
²⁵ https://artomicparticles.tumblr.com/post/95126208009/no-child-left-behind-cartoon-by-david-horsey
²⁶ https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/electoral-colleges-racist-origins
²⁷ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_elections_by_popular_vote_margin

Elon Musk Launches Into American Politics

This is a transcript of a New York Times podcast from December 13, 2024. All rights belong to the originator and owner.

The world’s richest man may now be the single most influential figure in the emerging White House of Donald Trump.

This transcript was created using speech recognition software. While it has been reviewed by human transcribers, it may contain errors. Please review the episode audio before quoting from this transcript and email transcripts@nytimes.com with any questions.

rachel abrams
From “The New York Times,” I’m Rachel Abrams, and this is “The Daily.”

[THEME MUSIC]

After single-handedly remaking the auto industry, social media, and the global space race, Elon Musk is now turning his attention and personal fortune to politics. Over the past few months, he became the single most influential figure in the race for president and now the emerging White House of Donald Trump. Today, my colleagues Kirsten Grind and Eric Lipton on what exactly Musk wants from the new president and why he’s so well-poised to get it.

It’s Wednesday, November 13.

Kirsten, we spent the last few months watching as Elon Musk really became kind of the face of Donald Trump’s campaign for president. And in the days since he won, Musk has only increased his proximity to President-elect Trump. And last night, of course, Trump announced that Musk would lead a new government agency. What will Musk’s specific role in the Trump administration be?

kristen grind
Late Tuesday evening, Donald Trump announced a bunch of new appointments to his new administration. And included in that was this role for Elon Musk. And what Donald Trump said is that Elon Musk will be leading up this completely new government department focused on efficiency. Efficiency is something that Elon Musk has been obsessed with for years. And basically, it’s just showing how much power Elon Musk is going to have in this administration and how much Donald Trump respects his opinion.

rachel abrams
Kirsten, you’ve covered Musk for years. Did any of this surprise you?

kristen grind
So I’m an investigative reporter who has written a lot about Elon Musk. And I have to say, I could have never predicted this political transformation that has happened over the last year. For him to become so involved in politics after really staying out of it for most of his life and career and being in the room with Donald Trump on election night is a metamorphosis I definitely was not prepared for.

rachel abrams
How did we get from a guy you would never have expected to get into politics to someone who’s about to potentially serve the White House?

kristen grind
The thing to understand about Elon Musk is that he really believes his goal in life and his mission is to save humanity. He has made it his focus and the focus of all of his companies to save the world. For example, he started SpaceX more than two decades ago with the goal of getting humanity to Mars in case something happened to Earth. He was an early investor in Tesla and became its CEO because he was worried about fossil fuels.

rachel abrams
And he’s become the world’s richest man by doing all of these ventures. But how do we go from that and from him wanting to save humanity, possibly by colonizing Mars, to basically becoming a key supporter and really a surrogate for Trump?

kristen grind
It’s a very unusual and unconventional transformation. For most of his early career, he had leaned Democratic, but really he just wasn’t into politics at all. And for the most part, he stayed out of it. But there’s a few things that happened in the last four years that really started to shift his outlook.

[QUIRKY MUSIC]

So let’s start in 2020, the pandemic.

archived recording 1
All of California this morning now under a shelter-in-place order.

archived recording 2
Governor Newsom’s order, an unprecedented action, calls for —

kristen grind
California had tons of stay-at-home restrictions on residents and businesses. And most of Elon Musk’s company operations were in California. And Musk speaks out against what’s happening.

archived recording (elon musk)
Is it right to infringe upon people’s rights, as what is happening right now?

kristen grind
He is extremely antiregulation, hates to have the government or really anyone tell him what to do.

archived recording (elon musk)
This is fascist.

kritsten grind
And so the fact that he was going to have to close his Tesla factories because of the pandemic made him so angry.

archived recording (elon musk)
This is not freedom. Give people back their goddamn freedom.

kristen grind
And finally, he threatened and then ultimately did move factories out of the state.

rachel abrams
Wow, so this really pushed him over the edge what happened in California.

kristen grind
It really did. But then something happened the next year in 2021 that was even more angering to him, and which seems like a small thing, but has been something that he’s like never been able to get over.

[APPLAUSE]

archived recording (joe biden)
Please, everybody sit down. Please, please, please.

kristen grind
The Biden administration held this electric vehicle summit.

archived recording (joe biden)
And I also want to thank the leaders of the big three companies for being here today.

kristen grind
And they invited all the big carmakers from all over the country to go.

archived recording (joe biden)
— when they make the first electric Corvette, I get to drive it.

[chuckles]
Right, Mary?

kristen grind
Except for Tesla and Elon Musk.

archived recording (elon musk)
Biden held this EV summit.

kristen grind
Elon was furious.

archived recording (elon musk)
He didn’t mention Tesla once and praised GM and Ford for leading the EV revolution.

archived recording 3
So you were a pissed.

archived recording (elon musk)
Does this is sound maybe a little biased?

kristen grind
And he has never been able to let this go, the snub from the Biden administration.

archived recording (elon musk)
It’s not the friendliest administration.

It seems to be controlled by the unions, as far as I can tell.

kristen grind
And basically, it created so much tension between Tesla and the administration that that also kind of set him on his political journey.

rachel abrams
So it sounds like the Biden administration is on notice at this point that Musk is really upset. And it’s not just for business reasons. It’s really becoming kind of personal.

kristen grind
That’s right. But it also becomes ideological, too, because remember, around 2022, he buys Twitter, renames it X. And he basically says he buys it to make it a free speech platform. He especially thinks that conservatives had been censored on Twitter. Remember, at this point, Donald Trump had been kicked off Twitter and other conservative voices.

And he wants it to be this sort of place for free speech of all kinds. And around this time, he really start to see a shift in what he is posting about on X. And it becomes way more focused on what he’s called the woke mind virus. What this basically means is, for example, diversity, equity, and inclusion measures, transgender rights, pronoun use, all of that seems to be angering Elon Musk significantly on X. And he starts posting about it more and more.

[TENSE MUSIC]

archived recording (elon musk)
So it’s very possible for adults to manipulate children who are having a natural identity crisis into believing that they are the wrong gender.

kristen grind
And I want to bring up this other thing that, to me, really shows how far down this rabbit hole he had gone —

archived recording 4
Why are you willing to make this an issue, do you think?

archived recording (elon musk)
Well, it’s happened to one of my —

kristen grind
— which is that his daughter, Vivian, who’s one of his older children, had come out as transgender.

archived recording (elon musk)
I was essentially tricked into signing documents.

kristen grind
And Musk claimed in an interview that he was tricked into signing these medical forms for Vivian and allowing her to do her transition when she was 16.

archived recording (elon musk)
This is before I had really any understanding of what was going on. And we had COVID going on. And so there was a lot of confusion.

kristen grind
That he had not been aware of this basically.

archived recording (elon musk)
They call it “deadnaming” for a reason.

archived recording 4
Yeah.

kristen grind
And he said in this interview that she had been killed.

archived recording (elon musk)
Killed by the woke mind virus. So I vowed to destroy the woke mind virus after that. And we’re making some progress.

kristen grind
She had some choice words back to him and also said that he was not tricked into signing those forms. But the whole incident just really showed how his thinking has changed and been radicalized over these last few years.

Another example of his ideological transformation is immigration. And that’s kind of ironic because Elon Musk, himself, is from South Africa. But over the last couple years, he starts really focusing on illegal immigrants. And he keeps talking about how he feels the Democratic Party is allowing in these illegal immigrants so that they can get a majority and win the election.

rachel abrams
So he’s just espousing this conspiratorial rhetoric right out in the open on his own platform.

kristen grind
That’s right. And it’s really this ideology that is so different from what you saw from him even just a couple years earlier.

rachel abrams
OK, so all of that helps me understand how by 2024, Musk is increasingly aligned with right-wing ideology. But when do he and Donald Trump actually get together in some meaningful way?

kristen grind
So it’s a little hard to tell because Musk’s world is very insular. But you can kind see why, at this point, he and Trump are so aligned. So the two people are so similar.

rachel abrams
Really? Like how?

kristen grind
I mean, they both have immense wealth and power, but they both act like outsiders and victims. I think this one is maybe the most important, which is that they both think the system is broken and they both really think that they are the ones to fix it and they kind of refuse to stick with the status quo.

And so we know at one point earlier this year, Musk met with some billionaire friends his, one of whom was encouraging him to get involved in the campaign and to donate, which would be pretty normal for someone of his stature and wealth. And then we know at some point earlier this year, he did also meet with Trump. And then by June, he had established a super PAC ready to invest in Trump’s campaign.

rachel abrams
So can you just break down for a second? What does that support actually look like?

kristen grind
It is above and beyond what a normal donor would do, that’s for sure. So his Super PAC has donated more than a hundred million. That would be kind of normal for a billionaire or another donor, perhaps. But what has been unusual is the Super PAC, which is called America PAC, was in Pennsylvania knocking on doors. They knocked on 11 million doors in battleground states. [CHEERING]

archived recording (donald trump)
Come on up here, Elon.

kristen grind
But the most amazing thing to me has been watching him at these rallies.

archived recording (elon musk)
The energy in this room is incredible.

kristen grind
Right up on stage, he was with Trump.

archived recording (elon musk)
America is just not not going to be great, America is going to reach heights that it has never seen before. The future is going to be amazing!

[CHEERING]

kristen grind
He was just right out there with him, almost like he was running for president.

[crowd chanting, “elon”]
archived recording (elon musk)
You guys are awesome. Honestly, this is like ah. Wow.

rachel abrams
But wasn’t this man trying to run like six companies and colonize Mars? How did he have time for all of this?

kristen grind
[LAUGHS]: Yes, well, that’s a very good question. He has a lot of good people running his companies. But meanwhile, to take it back to his whole life’s goal, which is to save humanity, that’s actually exactly what he thinks he is doing here. And, in fact, he has said recently that he still really did not want to get into politics, but that he had to because civilization was on the line. So that, again, is why he is out there.

And on election night, there’s this big family photo with Trump, and Melania, their kids, their grandkids, and there’s Elon Musk just right beside them. And in the few days since the election, he’s basically been camped out at Mar-a-Lago.

He was reportedly on this phone call with the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Trump. He’s been advising Trump on cabinet positions. And then, as we know on Tuesday night, he got his own position appointed.

[INQUISITIVE MUSIC]

And we’ve just never seen anything like this, this super billionaire, Elon Musk, suddenly with all this potential power in the federal government.

rachel abrams
After the break, I talked to my colleague Eric Lipton about what Musk stands to gain from a Trump White House.

So, Eric, we just heard from our colleague Kirsten Grind that it has not taken Elon Musk very long to insert himself into this emerging Trump presidency in a way that feels without precedent, frankly. And you’ve been looking into exactly what Musk could stand to gain from access to a Trump White House. But first, can you just remind us, what is Elon Musk’s current relationship with the federal government?

eric lipton
I think it’s underappreciated the extent to which Elon Musk has relied on the federal government to help build his own wealth and the size of his companies. He has at least a hundred different contracts pending with the federal government with 17 different agencies. The majority of that work is with SpaceX, which has really owed its existence, largely, to the federal government. NASA kicked it off by giving SpaceX the money that it needed to build the Falcon 9 rocket, which now puts almost all of the world’s cargo into orbit each year. More than every other nation in the world combined.

rachel abrams
Oh, wow.

eric lipton
And SpaceX alone has gotten $10 billion worth of contracts from the federal government over the last five years to deliver stuff to space. That includes cargo to the Space Station, astronauts to the Space Station, spy satellites, missile defense systems, and dozens of other items for the federal government. And it’s unlike any other commercial space company in the history of the United States, in terms of the extent of its dominance and the money that’s going to it to provide those services to the federal government.

rachel abrams
So government contracts really made Musk in a way. Like, he’s clearly been very successful under the status quo. So that sort of begs the question of, what more is there for him to gain?

eric lipton
I mean, since Musk created SpaceX back in 2002, he’s been completely fixated with getting humans to Mars. And one of the things that incredibly frustrates him is when he encounters paperwork requirements and regulatory slowdowns. He often comments about how he can build his rockets faster than federal bureaucrats can move paper from one side of their desk to the other. It just totally burns him up.

And that’s, in part, what has motivated him to get more involved in politics. He thinks it might give him the power to help defang them, and to limit their power, and to reduce what he considers to be redundant or ridiculous requirements to help wipe away some of this slowness that really frustrates him. And Musk was clear during the presidential campaign that he wanted to be named to a position in the future Trump government that would give him the power to help oversee significantly cutting back on federal regulations, federal employees, and federal spending.

He liked to jokingly call this the “Department of Government Efficiency,” nicknamed DOGE, which is the same name of one of his favorite crypto coins. Musk has a tendency to love little names like that he can repeat that are insider jokes. And he would be this superpowered czar overseeing the reach of federal government operations and looking for ways to eliminate what he considers redundant federal regulations and cutting as much as $2 trillion in federal spending, which is a crazy and really unachievable goal, but that’s what he says he wants to do.

rachel abrams
Which is basically the position that Trump just announced for him with this new government department that’s in charge of making all kinds of cuts across the government, kind of spiritually similar to what Musk did with Twitter.

eric lipton
Yeah, Trump likes to tell Musk that he’s super impressed with what Musk was able to do at Twitter. He jokingly calls him Cutter In Chief. He sees Musk as having an incredible capacity to find ways to reduce costs and get rid of waste. And, in fact, at Twitter, when he bought it, Musk, of course, cut something like 2/3 of its staff. And it’s a bit bumpy, but X does function without more than 2/3 of the people that it had when he purchased the company. So Trump has confidence that Musk is the guy that he needs to actually really significantly cut federal regulations and spending.

rachel abrams
But a tech company works a lot differently, obviously, than a government agency. Like it doesn’t really seem feasible that he could just go in, slash a bunch of jobs overnight, like what he did with Twitter, and have that work the same way.

eric lipton
Yeah, and a level of reduction in spending and regulations, that has never been achieved before in the history of the United States. And when it comes to actually cutting federal regulations, and laying off federal employees, and cutting federal spending, this is a process that obviously Congress participates in and it is a very hard thing to do. There’s a constituency for every little agency out there. And so it is a lot harder than simply announcing one day they are laying off thousands of people at a private company that you own.

rachel abrams
How do you think all of this is actually going to play out?

eric lipton
We don’t know what Elon Musk’s first targets would be. But there’s a couple of examples that frustrate him in terms of conflicts that he’s had with federal regulators. Probably the best example is with SpaceX and what he’s trying to do down in Boca Chica, Texas, near the Mexican border, where they’re testing out the Starship rocket.

And they have repeatedly caused some environmental damage in that area. And it’s right on the edge of a national wildlife refuge and a state park. And as they were developing the rocket, they were repeatedly disregarding what the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Interior Department said was the limits on their operations.

rachel abrams
What exactly were those limits?

eric lipton
I mean, for example, recently on one of their launches, there’s so much power that comes out of these rockets, it sent sand and rocks flying into the nearby state park, and it destroyed a bunch of nesting areas for the local bird population, and ripped open the eggs and destroyed the nests of the birds that were there.

I saw that right after the launch. I walked out into the area once they’d cleared it for the public. And the egg yolk was there staining the ground. And that’s another matter that’s being investigated by Fish and Wildlife Service for potentially harming migratory birds. It’s something that frustrates him. And he thought that our coverage of it was so offensive, he said he would restrain from having omelets for several days.

rachel abrams
Oh, my god.

eric lipton
He thought it was so ridiculous that we were even worried about these nests that were destroyed by his launch.

rachel abrams
So you can imagine that the EPA would be the first target on his efficiency to-do list.

eric lipton
I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s one of the first places that he goes and he looks to try to roll back some of the regulatory powers that it has. But that certainly would not be the only agency that he would go after. I mean, all you have to do is look at Tesla.

And he is being currently or recently investigated or sued by really an acronym soup of federal agencies — the Equal Opportunity Commission, the National Labor Relations Board, the Securities Exchange Commission, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the Department of Justice, of course, the EPA. All of them are looking at Tesla and suggesting that it has overstepped the law. I mean, most importantly, there’s concern about the autonomous driving tools on his cars and whether or not they’ve been involved in fatal accidents.

But everything having to do with disrupting union activities, who he hires at his auto factories and whether or not he’s properly treating refugees and people who have asylum. I mean, he is the subject of so many different simultaneous investigations. It really frustrates him. And that’s another part of the reason that he’s active with Trump is he wants to crush those investigations. And it’s likely that many of them will now be shut down.

rachel abrams
So everything you’ve laid out so far, Eric, it helps us understand why Musk’s own personal business interests could benefit from the regulatory environment that he’s potentially going to be reshaping. But is this all legal? It seems to me that what you’ve outlined could be a major conflict of interest.

eric lipton
It’s going to create a conflict of interest that really has few precedents in American history. Here’s a guy who has $10 billion or more of ongoing federal contracts. He has a couple dozen pending federal investigations and lawsuits that he’s targeted in. And, of course, there are federal conflict of interest laws that prohibit just this kind of mixing of duties, and violating them could be a federal offense.

So how is it possible that Elon Musk could simultaneously play the role of trying to cut back on federal regulations if he is, himself, being regulated? And the announcement we saw from Trump on Tuesday night actually sort of hints that they recognize that there’s this clash. And they’re attempting to sidestep it by suggesting that Musk would somehow be the leader of this new federal department of government efficiency, but he would do it while remaining, quote, “outside of the government.”

rachel abrams
So basically, he can have the ear of the president, but not have the formal government position and all the conflict-of-interest headaches that come with it.

eric lipton
Yeah, it’s a lot more attractive. But this is a very murky arrangement. And all of this assumes that Trump and Musk are going to stay on good terms. There are two personalities that have a history of exploding with people that they’ve been close with, with business partners, and even some of their most trusted employees. And so they’re guys that also hold grudges and are a bit impulsive. So there’s no guarantee that this is a relationship that’s going to last.

rachel abrams
So after all of this, your investigation and how it revealed the various ways that Musk’s potential reshaping of the government could benefit him, what is your big takeaway?

eric lipton
I think the thing that’s really fascinating and that we, at “The New York Times” are going to be watching closely, is the extent to which this new administration is one that’s going to be defined by the desires of billionaires. And the first Trump administration was really more focused on things like the oil and gas industry and the Christian right wanting to see more appointments to the Supreme Court.

But the array of economic interests being pushed by billionaire donors to Trump in this second term is much broader and their buddy-buddy relationship with Trump is much tighter. I mean, it’s the crypto industry. It’s artificial intelligence. It’s the tech industry and the antitrust approach that the government has to the tech industry.

[TENSE MUSIC]

There’s a bunch of players that have surrounded Trump, and Elon Musk is at the center of this crew. Many of these folks are friends of Musk. And he is the ringleader of the whole group. And I think that they are going to have much more influence in what happens in the White House and across the federal government in the next four years.

rachel abrams
Right. I mean, billionaires have always had some sort of influence in government, but we just haven’t really seen the proximity that you’ve outlined between this incredibly rich and powerful man, the world’s richest man, and the president of the United States.

eric lipton
Yeah, I think that it’s just a different set of players at the table this time around, who have such vested interest in so many sectors of the economy that reach really across the playing field. “Oligarchs” is too strong of a word. But we are entering a period where people with immense wealth are interacting with a president, who is known and has a history of being extremely transactional. And these are folks that now helped Trump get a second term and are expecting to see a return on that investment.

rachel abrams
Eric, thank you very much.

eric lipton
Thank you.

rachel abrams
We’ll be right back.

Here’s what else you need to know today. President-elect Donald Trump has nominated military veteran and FOX News host, Pete Hegseth, as his defense secretary, but his lack of relevant experience has already generated pushback. Hegseth is one of several political appointees Trump has picked in recent days, including South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem for secretary of Homeland Security and House Representative Elise Stefanik for ambassador to the United Nations. Trump is expected to meet with President Biden at the White House later today. It’s part of a long-standing tradition of the outgoing president greeting the new one.

[THEME MUSIC]

Today’s episode was produced by Rikki Novetsky, Olivia Natt, Rob Szypko and Luke Vander Ploeg. It was edited by MJ Davis Lin, Brendan Klinkenberg, with help from Chris Haxel. It contains original music by Dan Powell and Rowan Niemisto, and was engineered by Chris Wood. Our theme music is by Jim Brunberg and Ben Landsverk of Wonderly.

That’s it for “The Daily.” I’m Rachel Abrams. See you tomorrow.

Peanuts: Stereophonic-Fussing (and more)

According to the Peanuts Museum on Facebook, the strip below was first published on January 7, 1957⁠:

Now that’s a cute strip, but I’ve also seen the following panels out there:

I’m quite intrigued by these additions, and would love to know if they are part of the same strip, or are subsequent strips, or fan-created materials. Google and Lens have been no help.

Any ideas out there?

The Old Wolf has spoken.

The Political Correction of Sesame Street

Fortunata

Cross-posted from LiveJournal, originally posted 11/4/2009. Still valid today.

I read today an interesting and disturbing article about the evolution of Sesame Street over the last 4 decades, written to coincide with the show’s 40th anniversary. According to Katie McLaughlin of CNN, “In the early days of “Sesame Street” — that is, B.E. (Before Elmo) — Sesame Street was a pretty grimy place.” It was designed that way, in order to reach inner-city kids and bring both facts and a thirst for learning into a milieu that they could relate to.

The Cookie Monster smoked a pipe, which he ate on occasion, along with anything else that he hallucinated looked like a cookie; Oscar was a mean S.O.B., kids rode bicycles without helmets, and kindly neighbors invited little girls into their apartments for milk and cookies.

The only way to re-live the Sesame Street of the 60’s is on DVD, where the episodes are preceded by some mealy-mouthed attorney’s caveat: “These early ‘Sesame Street’ episodes are intended for grown-ups, and may not suit the needs of today’s preschool child.” By Mogg’s adamantium claws, that is so disingenuous it makes me want to puke myself.

Miss Katie goes on to say, “For better or worse, today’s preschooler is very different from the 1969 version. And children’s television programming simply has to reflect that.”

Horsehockey.

Today’s preschooler is exactly the same as those of 40 years ago, or those in the 1890’s, or those in 1492. What has changed is the hypersensitivity of the liberal media to anything that might offend anyone, and the capitulation of society in general to the whims of attorneys hungry for billable hours.

In my day, kids fell off of jungle gyms and out of tree houses regularly, suffered black eyes and broken arms, and nobody got sued. Watch E.T. again, and see how many of the wicked boys in that movie wore helmets as they ripped and tore around the hills on their BMX bikes. S̶e̶x̶ ̶e̶d̶u̶c̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ ̶w̶a̶s̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶a̶ ̶p̶a̶r̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶g̶r̶a̶m̶m̶a̶r̶ ̶s̶c̶h̶o̶o̶l̶ ̶c̶u̶r̶r̶i̶c̶u̶l̶u̶m̶,̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶t̶e̶e̶n̶ ̶p̶r̶e̶g̶n̶a̶n̶c̶y̶ ̶r̶a̶t̶e̶s̶ ̶w̶e̶r̶e̶ ̶a̶ ̶f̶r̶a̶c̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶w̶h̶a̶t̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶y̶ ̶a̶r̶e̶ ̶t̶o̶d̶a̶y̶. [I have been corrected regarding this claim] Kids who used bad language or were disrespectful to their elders developed a severe drug problem: they were ‘drug’ to the woodshed, or ‘drug’ to the bathroom to have their mouths washed out with soap.

No, it’s not the preschoolers who have changed, but the society around them. And if you ask me, having a show as freshly original as Sesame Street (designed for those who needed it most and had access to the very least) “power washed” to conform to the sensibilities of the toffee-nosed elite is a sin, a shame, and a crime.

The culprit is apathy.

I just saw today a Facebook post by a valued colleague encouraging people to take the high road with political commentary and memes, implying that such things are beneath people of good will. While the sentiment is worthy and I respect his desire to have charity, the danger is also real – much more real than most people are willing to admit.

Germany happened just as much because of apathy as it did because of active malice. When I have returned to the dust, I want my posterity to know what I stood for and what I did to resist evil. If America devolves into a fascist autocracy, it will not be because I did nothing and said nothing.

This article from 20 October 1974, saved by the Maryland State Archives during the height of the Watergate era, is powerfully revelatory; today’s political situation makes Watergate look like a Romper Room picnic.

“The culprit is apathy. Few people will ever commit themselves. They aren’t for or against anything. They just remain indifferent. Most German people were not Nazis because of their convictions, but because they had none. They did not help Hitler, they just let him happen.” – Dr. Hilgunt Zazzenhaus

The memes may be, on some level, mean-spirited. But the target of those memes – Donald J. Trump and the MAGA cult who either worships the ground he walks on or who view him as a useful idiot for the furthering of their own ends, specifically power and influence, are more mean-spirited and cruel and destructive than the political statements.

If you care about America’s future, vote all Republicans out, everywhere, at all ballot levels, from now until the heat death of the universe.

The Old Wolf has spoken, and is not ashamed.

The confusing world of Chinese drop-shipping

I start by saying I have no understanding whatever of how this works. But here’s what happened with my last online order from a company called “buletboard.”¹

I wish I had bought these directly from Amazon, I could have gotten an instant refund, because these things are:

So poorly designed that there’s hardly an American car that the device will clip to. I barely got it to stay on my Rav4, and then the phone essentially blocks my view of the road. The device does not take phone cases into consideration, the phone barely fits in the clips, and getting the phone into the holder is close to impossible. Shame on me for buying from China once again.

The product was ordered on August 16, and arrived today, September 10th. But the most interesting thing was the emails I kept getting from the company about “The status of your parcel has been updated.”

  • Belfast,bt170wg,United Kingdom,The shipment has been processed in the parcel center of origin.
  • The shipment has left the sorting center.
  • Lincoln,LN4 3SD,United Kingdom,The shipment is in transit in United Kingdom.
  • The shipment arrived at the customs of United Kingdom.
  • The shipment is being inspected at the customs of United Kingdom.
  • The shipment has been shipped to United States.
  • The shipment arrived at the customs of United States.
  • The shipment is declared at the customs clearance of United States.
  • Departed Shipping Partner Facility in the United States.
  • Transit: New Orleans,70139,United States,The shipment is in transit in the country of United States. (four days after the parcel arrived.)

When the package arrived, it had several labels, one on top of the other. The first one was in Chinese, and included my name, address, the product description, and a bunch of barcodes.

The second label indicated that it was shipped from “Online Seller, 2700 Center DR, Dupont, WA 98327.

This is far, far from the East coast where I would have expected the package to arrive, if it were indeed being shipped from Belfast, and being processed through customs in the UK. It’s also an Amazon fulfillment center.

The second, final label indicated that the sender was:

DEBRAG HABOUSHS
3511 VICTORY BLVD
STATEN ISLAND NY 10314

A self-storage office? This makes no sense at all. I mean, I can see the package being sent from Washington on the West Coast if the item were shipped from China, to a distribution point in the East, since we live in Maine. But a self-storage office, and with such a phony-sounding name?

One thing is clear: the chain of emails sent to me by “buletboard” was 100% bogus, since the product obviously came directly from China. Combine that with the poor quality of the product I received and essentially wasted my money on, should be a glaring drudge siren flashing in my eyes to remind me never to buy anything from a Chinese vendor again.

The Old Wolf has sadly spoken.

Footnotes

¹ Most of these Chinese companies must use random name generators for their popup companies which are here today and gone tomorrow, re-appearing somewhere else with a new name after the first one is shut down for shady dealings.