After the Port Arthur massacre in Australia, former Australian Prime Minister John Howard said, “We have an opportunity in this country not to go down the American path.” And they took that opportunity: Australia banned semi-automatic rifles and shotguns – weapons that can kill many people quickly – and implemented a 28-day waiting period, thorough background checks, and a requirement to present a “justifiable reason” to own a gun.
Guns were not banned outright, and while gun violence did not end in Australia, it was cut by roughly half since 1996 – and there has never been another Port Arthur since.
In 1987, a single gunman killed 16 people in what came to be known as the Hungerford Massacre. As a result, made registration mandatory for owning shotguns and banning semi-automatic and pump-action weapons.
Despite this action, in 1996 an unspeakable, cowardly bastard burst into the gymnasium of a primary school in Dunblane, Scotland, and killed 15 children aged five and six along with their teacher before turning one of his handguns on himself. By 18 months later, UK lawmakers had passed a ban on the private ownership of all handguns in mainland Britain, resulting in some of the toughest anti-gun legislation in the world.
The United States
In the first month and a half of 2018, there had been 17 shooting incidents at schools in our country. Some were accidental, some were intentional, one was suicide, and some resulted in no injury or death – but 22 people died, and many more were injured. As of this writing, there have been 290 school shootings since 2013.
Even one is too many.
But the odds that the United States will ever ban firearms outright approach my odds of winning the lottery – that is to say, virtually nonexistent.
From where I sit, there are two dominant reasons for this, reasons which have the weight of history behind them.
1. The right to bear arms is guaranteed by the Second Amendment to our Constitution:
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
The interpretation of the scope of that statement, in the absence of the people who framed it, is being examined in courts on a continual basis. More about this in a bit.
2. Firearms are an integral part of our nation’s history
For better or for worse, our nation’s history depended on firearms. The expanding frontier and the uncertainties of life in a lawless country made owning a firearm (or an armory) often meant the difference between survival and becoming a nameless skeleton on the prairie.
“Why don’t she write?”
But after surviving the hostile elements, there was still the matter of putting food on the table. Hunting in American has morphed from a matter of daily bread to a wildly popular sport; in Utah, for example, teachers expect classrooms to be oddly empty during the deer hunt.
When I was growing up, guns were everywhere. It may be why “A Christmas Story” is such a popular movie with a certain generation:
Ads for air rifles and BB guns were seen in just about every comic book:
At summer camp, we had a BB range and a rifle range. I loved riflery, and in 1964 I attained the Junior NRA rank of “Sharpshooter 2nd Bar.” I would have certainly gone farther had I been able to attend camp more frequently – target shooting was a lot of fun, and I was proud to have earned these.
I owned many toy guns and weapons of mass destruction when I was a kid – and playing “cops and robbers” and “cowboys and Indians” was just what was done.
In our games, when you got shot dead you always just got up again… even if they got you right behind the davenport. While our riflery instructor was impeccably serious about safety on the range, there was never any training given on how to handle a gun safely in the real world, or education around the fact that guns were designed to kill things instead of hit targets at 50 feet, or that when you’re dead, that’s it – there’s no coming back for a second chance.
The fact that guns are written into America’s DNA has allowed the NRA to morph from an organization for sports enthusiasts into a powerful political entity – one which seems determined to preserve and expand its influence at all costs. And their “cold dead hands,” any weapon, any time, any caliber, any size, any magazine, any bump-stock philosophy has been adopted by a significant portion of our citizenry, including a significant number of our legislators who take obscene amounts of money from the NRA, all the while sending their “thoughts and prayers” to the victims without being willing to do anything about the carnage.
The recent shooting at Parkland left 17 people dead. I haven’t even mentioned other gun-related deaths, such as the one in Las Vegas that killed 58 people and injured 851.
It’s time for a change.
Yes, the 2nd Amendment still guarantees our citizenry the right to bear arms, but I do not believe – I will not believe – that the writers of that amendment ever meant for a single individual to own something like this, unless the zombie apocalypse were a real possibility:
Justice Antonin Scalia, a conservative voice on the Supreme Court, wrote:
“Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited…”. It is “…not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.”
I personally believe that the writers of the 2nd Amendment would be shocked if they saw how that little bit of the Constitution was being interpreted and argued and implemented today, especially if they viewed the daily carnage in a nation with between 270 million to 310 million firearms, depending on whose estimate you believe.
As long as the 2nd Amendment remains in force, we as citizens of this country must balance a right to bear arms with an end to the daily death toll which has reached untenable proportions – indeed, has been unbearable for decades.
If you want to own a gun, this is how it should go:
- You take “Firearm Education,” a government-approved class on firearm operation and safety. (Note that many states mandate a driver’s ed class of at least 30 hours.)
- You take a written and practical test on the type of firearm for which you wish an endorsement.
- You submit to a background check. The current Brady Law mandates use of the NICS, but as we have seen with the Florida and Las Vegas shootings, past actions are not always an indicator of future ones. Too many red flags were missed in the case of the perpetrators; more needs to be done to keep weapons out of the hands of unstable individuals.
- Your guns are registered, licensed, and taxed, just like your cars are. Nobody tells you how many cars you can own, or of what kind, as long as you’re licensed to drive them and pay all relevant taxes and fees.
- You have liability insurance on each weapon.
- Your weapons are inspected and re-registered at yearly intervals, just like your car. Aside from the die-hard sovereign-nation groups, nobody complains about having to re-register cars, or pay excise taxes, or have them inspected for safety, or maintain current insurance. It’s for everyone’s safety, owner and public alike.
In addition to this, I call for a total ban on semiautomatic weapons in the hands of private individuals. They are weapons of war; nobody needs one of these killing machines for hunting, or for any other purpose short of the above-mentioned zombie apocalypse. Bump stocks are a no-brainer – they make no sense.
I have many gun-toting, sharpshooting, hunting, and reloading friends who will disagree with my opinions, but that’s how America works. This is such a highly-charged issue that I debated about disabling comments on this post, but I have always supported civil discourse on difficult issues. Ignorant and trollish comments will be ignored and deleted without ceremony.
The Old Wolf has spoken.
Wolf, thank you so much for your post and I agree with you completely! K. D. 🙂
Pingback: Warren Burger on the Second Amendment | Playing in the World Game
Thank you.. for your comments and outline.. I have been looking for a model of how it should be… I agree.. it should be similar to a drivers license… a car can be just as deadly…
EXACTLY!! We are in the throes of a lethal “addiction”, and we desperately need to get ahold of ourselves and tackel this problem! Thank you for your insights! And I LOVE the Zombie Apocalypse reference…. REALLY puts it in perspective how ridiculous we are about guns. Thank you!
The vast majority of guns are semi-automatic and you’re calling for a ban on them? What should people carry then? Revolvers? Shotguns? How would you round up all the semi-automatic weapons that exist today?
Yes, absolutely. These are weapons of war, and we have no need of them for the purposes outlined in the 2nd Amendment. The NRA likes to promote the myth that we should stockpile as much armament as possible to overthrow the government in case it becomes too limiting of our rights, forgetting that armed overthrow of our government is considered treason, and they conveniently forget the fact that treason is punishable by law, and that the Constitution only supports governmental change via established democratic means.
Yes, I would round them all up, I would support “coming to take your guns.” But only the illegal ones. If responsible gun owners followed the stipulations I have outlined in my essay, they could legally and responsibly own as many firearms as they wanted.
People should have no need to “carry” weapons at all. But since that right seems to be protected constitutionally, keeping a 9mm with a 15-round mag on your hip should admirably answer the “self defense” argument for the incurably paranoid.
So…that last sentence…you realize that a 15-round 9mm is by definition a ‘semi-automatic weapon’, yes? I think you mean to outright ban all ‘semi-automatic, hi-capacity rifles’ [aka AR-15 et al] Correct?
I more and more agree with this [much to my surprise.]
I recently did a YouTube on this very subject and touched on most of the points you do…except for the annual inspection, and especially the taxation.
Don’t know that I want that many people schlepping their guns out to be inspected. Guns don’t become unsafe if the brake pads are worn…but they’re easily stolen out of a car.
And I *really* don’t see the need for yet more taxes.
I also talked more about the intent of the 2nd…so that farmers with muskets could defeat a tyrannical government and their muskets. Today, no AR-15 will be a match for our military gone rogue. They got nukes.
Finally, and something you don’t really address is how to round up and compensate folks for banned weapons. I really foresee a Prohibition-style result…lots of black market activity and gangster-like deaths. Maybe those deaths are a fair trade? [bad guys instead of school kids?…maybe so]
Really excellent comment, some good points here that need to be added to the overall discussion.